Labels:book | bulletin board | poster | reckoner | sky OCR: owners enjoy and it enjoined Oregon's collection of any ad tax on carlines transportation property. SUMMARY CF ARGUMENT Carlines may not rely section 11503(b]{4} to challenge Oregon' property tax discriminatory. The first three subsections the statute are directed detailed terrs to the bases for challenging personal real property taxes Subsection (b){4} follows those subsections. and forbids State fram imposing another tax that discriminates against railroad property Uader the plain language of the statute the provision available only test "other allegedly discriminatory taxes does not provide additional different basis for challenging State general property tax The pidm Congress used are as plain as language can T resort to legislative history is appropriate to determine the statute's sco ...
(.png)
